Daily Archives: March 16, 2011

17 posts

Thought For Food – Cookbooks Meant for Reading

Most cookbooks spend a life of solitude on a dusty shelf only pulled down to have sauces splashed on them for special occasions.  The following two cookbooks deserve to be enjoyed in front of a fireplace with a glass of wine just like your torrid romance novels.

The Physiology of Taste
Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin

As Henry Fielding was to the English novel, so was Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin to the literature of gastronomy. It was Brillat Savarin who first said, “Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you who you are.”

If you’re a serious cook, this unusual volume will be old toque to you. But I’m surprised again and again at how often Brillat-Savarin slips below the radar of so many readers, even some who, like your humble servant, read cookbooks just because!

The Physiology of Taste
Jean Anthelme Brillat Savarin's Frontispiece and Title Page

His peerless masterpiece (title translated from the original French) was The Physiology of Taste, or Transcendental Meditations on Gastronomy, theoretical work, history and agenda, dedicated to Parisian gastronomy, by a professor, a member of several scholarly literary societies.

Originally published in December 1825, two months before Brillat-Savarin died, it’s a wonderful mix of 19th century French gourmandise, Enlightenment curiosity, and high spirits – this is a man with whom one might dine every day for a year and he’d never run out of food lore and opinion … or aphorisms and wit.

According to Wikipedia, remarkably, The Physiology of Taste

“… has not been out of print since it first appeared, shortly before Brillat-Savarin’s death. Its most notable English translation was done by food writer and critic M. F. K. Fisher, who remarked “I hold myself blessed among translators.” Her translation was first published in 1949.” — (Wikipedia)

There are recipes, though they’re more like vivid descriptions of a dish than precise, detailed directions as we know them. There are stories such as one might have heard over port a few years after Waterloo, expansive and entertaining table talk, part fabliau, part restaurant review, and part philosophy, scientific and spiritual alike.

Let’s consider Chapter VI: On Food In General. After a brief essay on bouillon and boulli, the boiled meat whence bouillon comes, Brillat-Savarin moves on to poultry, with particular fascination for the North American wild turkey; this leads in turn to the tale of a 1794 American turkeyshoot in which he participated. Next he strides in seven-league boots through the categories of game, from thrushes, snipe, partridge, quail, and rabbit, to wild boar and roebuck. Finally he turns to the piscine world and explains why fish is less nourishing than meat but a far more potent aphrodisiac.

Then he pauses to recount the story of a crustacean-mad colleague  with whom he shared a dinner: both men consumed three dozen raw oysters apiece, at which point Brillat-Savarin called a halt while his dining companion feasted on, consuming no fewer than thirty-two dozen oysters before the two tucked into the main course. All of which leads to the following marvelous Philosophical Reflection:

“Fish, by which I indicate all species of it considered as a whole, is for a philosopher an endless source of meditation and of astonishment.

“The varied forms of these strange creatures, the senses which they lack and the restrictions of those they possess, their different means of existence, the influence upon this of the places in which they must live and breathe and move about: all these things extend the world of our ideas and the limitless modifications which spring from matter, from movement, from life itself.

“As for myself, I feel something like a real respect for fish, which comes from my profound persuasion that they are plainly antediluvian creature; for the great Flood, which drowned our grand-uncles toward the eighteenth century of the creation of the world, was for the fishes no more nor less than a period of joy, conquest, and festivity.”

The Physiology of Taste abounds in such passages, as well as stories, scientific speculation, ecclesiastical and military history, not to mention a thorough primer on dangerously stimulating foods like the highly erotic truffle, and coffee, widely regarded as the crystal meth of its day. Brillat-Savarin explains why apothecaries prescribed and concocted various mixtures of chocolate as medications, and offers expert advice on how to hang, age, and stuff a pheasant with a pair of woodcock to make a gamy but unforgettable hunters’ meal. Not merely a book about food, this surprising, wide-ranging work is a treatise on late 18th- and early 19th century European life and world view, gathering into its capacious apron everything from natural philosophy to Napoleon’s various appetites to a vignette of a pretty demoiselle gourmande feasting at a groaning board; it’s a truly delicious book, fascinating, irresistible, and shot through with the profoundest pleasure at nature’s bounty. Even if it doesn’t seduce you into full-blown foodie-hood it will give you a new understanding of why the people who are passionate about food and cooking are the way they are.

 

Modernist Cuisine: The Art and Science of Cooking

Nathan Myrhvold, Chris Young, and Maxime Bilet

At a list price of $625 (but knocked down at Amazon.com to a frugal $460 and change) the new cookbook from former Microsoft Chief Technology Officer Nathan Myrhvold is described by Tim Zagat as “The most important book in the culinary arts since Escoffier.”

Even to describe Modernist Cuisine as a “book,” while true, is nevertheless rather misleading, something like comparing the US Army Official History of World War II with Norman Mailer’s The Naked and the Dead. Myrhvold and his co-authors spent a substantial Microsoft-generated fortune to create a no-expenses-spared Cooking Lab where a staff of 20 have created entirely new and astonishing flavors and extraordinary textures using equipment more suited to a chem lab than to a kitchen: autoclaves, water baths, homogenizers, vacuum chambers and even centrifuges, to work postmillennial magic on scary-sounding ingredients like hydrocolloids, gels, emulsifiers, enzymes, and foams.

Modernist Cuisine
Futurist Food is Now

The package itself is military-industrial in scale: six oversized volumes totaling 2,400 pages and weighing 50 pounds, illustrated with thousands of photographs and diagrams. The authors, scientists all as well as accomplished chefs in their own rights, have followed the path blazed by such pioneers of ‘molecular gastronomy’ as the Adrìa brothers at the Catalonian restaurant elBulli, named five times since 2000 as the best in the world, or Heston Blumenthal, who has led the Fat Duck, 25 miles from London, to its own 2005 Best Restaurant title.

The exotic gizmos and the bizarre though wonderfully tasty foodstuffs they produce tend to get the lion’s share of the food-critical attention (and not a little skepticism from much of the high-end gourmet world) but Myrhvold, Young, and Bilet haven’t limited themselves to cool futurist cuisine; their ambition is nothing less than to provide an encyclopedic reference to cooking in all its myriad aspects. There’s an entire chapter devoted to water, and your trusty old wok gets the same respect and attention as the latest in sous-vide technology. If you’re not so sure about splots and splashes of Day-Glo sauce deployed with a casual yet utterly calculated flick over a frothy confection that might have started out as a scoop of bone marrow, you should know that one reviewer declared the Modernist Cuisine‘s version of Mac’n’Cheese the best ever created. The book examines and explains everything: you’ll get all the usual methods (and some all-but-unheard-of techniques too) but you’ll also get detailed explanations not only what will come out of any given beaker, Klein bottle, or cast-iron kettle but also what is happening at every stage of the cooking process, whether a time-honored roast or a day-after-tomorrow centrifuged smoothie.

Meats alone get more than 250 pages of comprehensive coverage, and over 300 more present recipes created by many of the world’s most accomplished chefs. And while some of the more recherché machines and elaborately futuristic processed creations are sure to daunt all but the truly stout of heart, this encyclopedic reference to the culinary arts and sciences is a book that gets about as close as it’s possible to get to being all things to all cooks.

We began this week’s reading with one of the earliest literary endeavors that could in some way be described as a cookbook — written by a bon vivant who was also, by the lights of his age, a scientist. It seems, then, entirely fitting to close with the admiring words of David Chang (of Momofuku fame ) who described Modernist Cuisine as “the cookbook to end all cookbooks.”

How to Properly Nurture Your Duke Hatred

A hatred of Duke University and its White Blue Devils (I’m feeling nauseous already) burns deep inside of all right-thinking human beings. We are naturally repulsed by Duke to such an extent that it is now part of our natural evolutionary instincts. From the womb, we we enter this world already detesting Danny Ferry and Steve Wojochowski and (oh god, I’m going to vomit) Coach K.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CRASSTALK MARCH MADNESS BRACKET CONTEST

But while a low burning sensation is natural, a true Duke hater knows that he or she must refresh that hatred before each and every fresh NCAA tournament. Here’s a simple plan for how to really get yourself worked up with frothing, irrational, lovely Duke Hate:

1. Start by focusing on this year’s team.

You would think this one would be tough some seasons, but no. Literally every single season Duke fields a team full of various jagoffs, D-bags and other unlikeable goons and bozos. This year I recommend you spend a few minutes watching the thoroughly awful Plumlee Twins throw elbows and complain to the refs every time a call goes against Duke.

Good grief, extremists

2. Stare into the cold, dead, soulless eyes of Coach Mike Krzyzewski.

Do it for just a few seconds. Not too long, though, or you’ll be eternally raped by the ghost of J.J. Redick.

History's greatest monster

3. Reminisce about all the old Dukies you used to get so much pleasure from hating.

That’s the beauty of March Madness: It’s a great opportunity to fondly remember all those past seasons of hating Danny Ferry, Jay Bilas, Christian Laettner, Cherokee Parks (Oh god, I can taste the vomit trying  to come up), Bobby Hurley, Steve Wojciechowski, Jason Williams, J.J. Redick….. I could go on and on.

Sometimes around this time of year my dreams often involve a big honorary alumni game at Cameron Arena/Gymnasium Indoor Stadium that is attacked by a swarm of flying psychedelic sharks that kill everyone ever involved with the White Blue Devils. A boy can hope….

4. Read an intellectual takedown of Duke University.

This is always fun. Thanks to Duke’s irrepressible striving to be at the top of various magazine rankings and other superfluous bullshit, their overall creepiness always comes out upon close inspection. Witness Caitlin Flanagan (who is, I’ll admit, somewhat crazy herself) get worked up about the overall vibe of Duke while discussing the Karen Owens fiasco in a recent issue of The Atlantic Monthly:

In 2009, GQ magazine named Duke America’s second-douchiest college, a distinction that came with a caveat: “They’re probably number one. But we’d rather not rank Duke number one at anything.” It’s difficult to argue withGQ’s thinking on either score; something ugly is going on at the university—a mercenary intensity that has been gathering strength for the past two decades, as the institution made the calculated decision to wrench itself into elite status by dint of its fortune in tobacco money and its sheer ambition. It lured academic luminaries—many of them longer on star power than on intellectual substance—built a fearsome sports program, and turned its admissions department into the collegiate version of a head-hunting firm. (I was a college counselor at a prep school in the ’90s, and the zeal with which Duke gunned for our top students was unseemly.)

In some respects Duke has never moved on from the values of the 1980s, when droves of ambitious college students felt no moral ambivalence about preparing themselves for a life centered largely on the getting and spending of money. With a social scene dominated by fraternities and sororities (a way of life consisting of ardent partying and hooking up, offset by spurts of busywork composing angry letters to campus newspapers and taking online alcohol-education classes), with its large share of rich students displaying their money in the form of expensive cars and clothing, and with an attitude toward campus athletics that is at once deeply southern (this is a part of the world where even high-school athletes can be treated with awestruck deference by adults) and profoundly anti-intellectual, it’s a university whose thoughtful students are overshadowed by its voraciously self-centered ones.

SEE? THEY’RE A BUNCH OF RICH, DUMB, RAPEY PUNKS WHO WEAR BURBERRY AND DRIVE BMWS. NOTHING AT ALL LIKE MY SCHOOL!

5. Watch one of the many, many anti-Duke montage videos on YouTube.

The lower the production quality and more immature the jokes… the better.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CRASSTALK MARCH MADNESS BRACKET CONTEST

Dinner Conversation Starters- Fun with Bookshelves Contest!

I’m sure you are all familiar with the advice of  “three things not to talk about at a dinner party: religion, politics and race.”  Well, I have something of a perverse sense of humor, I admit.  So, here is a current picture of my bookshelf, completely visible to any unsuspecting guest who may come to visit (I don’t really cook, so they wouldn’t be coming for dinner.  But, maybe drinks!):

 

From right to left, the titles are:

  • Words of Fire, An Anthology of African-American Feminist Thought
  • Women Filmmakers of the African and Asian Diaspora
  • When Chickenheads Come Home to Roost: A Hip-hop Feminist Breaks It Down
  • The Way Home: Beyond Feminism, Back to Reality
  • Quiverfull: Inside the Christian Patriarchy Movement
  • Child Abuse Industry
  • The Holy Bible
  • The Communist Manifesto
  • Marx and Engels on Religion

Are you like me?  Do you take perverse joy in placing provocative (or scandalous!) reading material in plain view?  Ever forgotten about them until poor Grandma came to visit?  If so, submit your photo (re-arranging for purposes of this contest is allowed) or, if you don’t have the books anymore, your best story about your inappropriate reading habits and the hilarity and/or awkward moments that ensued!  Best submission will win the honor of declaring yourself “Most Inappropriate Crasstalk Book Owner Of 2011” (trophy and certificate not included in award).

Effin’ Nuclear Power: How does it work?

We’ve been hearing on the news since the earthquake/tsunami/all around shitty time in Japan started. However, have you wondered why these explosions are happening?  Well, I’ll attempt to explain it.

To break it down, fuel rods in a nuclear reactor are composed of zircoloid containing uranium dioxid  The uranium used in nuclear power plants, uranium 235, is a highly charged, fissile element.  When an element is fissile, it means it can sustain a fission chain reaction, so when the neutron (the tiny part of an atom that exists within the nucleus of said atom) touches another nucleus of uranium 235, a chain reaction occurs; causing energy release that can be harnessed via nuclear power plants.  Now, as anyone who has ever broken a sweat by way of physical effort knows that energy release creates heat, thereby making these fuel rods, well, wicked hot.

Don't try this at home.

Because these fission reactions can cause explosions, and to keep these rods from completely blowing up, the fission reaction is slowed down by control rods composed of boron, cadmium, and hafnium.  These elements can absorb neutrons, slowing the collision of the nuclei, and diminishing the power of the uranium rods.

In fact, if they become hot enough, they can swell and crack, which would cause radioactive gases (caesium and iodine) to escape, which is bad news bears for everyone.  So, a system had to be devised to keep these rods cool enough to; 1) not incinerate everyone in the area, 2) not melt a radioactive hole in the ground, and 3) not give everyone radiation poisoning.

And how do they do this?  With water, glorious water – is there anything it can’t do?  The Water is pumped into the reactor, which contains the insanely hot uranium rods, and is contained in a concrete housing.  To give you an idea of how effective concrete can be in protecting us from radiation; it’s what is keeping the Chernobyl reactor sealed off after their disaster in 1986.  Before you start to worry this will end up like Chernobyl, it’s not likely.  The reactors in the Chernobyl plant were not surrounded by any remotely effective barrier, leaving everyone completely unprotected from any sort of accident.  The Japanese know more, and are more careful than the people who ran the Chernobyl plant, so the risk is significantly lower.  However, the potential danger of the situation should not be underestimated, and per the graphic I “borrowed” from MSNBC, who borrowed it from Reuters, it looks like even the concrete containment unit won’t be guaranteed to always be able to contain the melted uranium.  There are several more things that have to happen for the situation to get to that point, but there’s a lot of chaos, a lot of danger, and a lot of unknowns at the moment.

Thank you, MSNBC

*ahem*  So, the reactor has pumps for both the control rods and the circulators which, surprise surprise, circulates the water around the rods which enables them to cool more effectively than standing water.  The heated water turns into steam in the reactor, which is then pumped out through the turbine to the condenser where the steam is converted to water once again.  Lather, rinse, repeat.

Because of the earthquake, the pumps in the reactor moving the cooling water failed, thereby allowing the uranium rods to overheat and produce excessive hydrogen-containing steam.  As the rods continue to get hotter due to the lack of circulating water, steam increases, as does the pressure inside the reactor.  The pressure then makes it impossible to pump more water into the reactor.  So, the engineers, with the intention of avoiding a meltdown, allowed some of the steam to vent out of the reactor and into the environment.  The downside is the steam releases radioactive elements into the environment, hence the warnings to stay indoors and/or evacuate.

Now how does all this relate to hydrogen?  When the zircoloid tubes containing the uranium dioxide heat up, they react with the cooling water to form hydrogen which builds up in there steam.  As anyone who is familiar with the Hindenberg knows, Hydrogen is extremely explosive, so excessive pressure inside the reactor+ a teensy bit of hydrogen escaping the reactor = big explosion.

If the water levels continue to drop within the reactor, the uranium rods will overheat and melt down through the reactor.  The good news?  The melted uranium will stay inside the concrete containment unit, as happened at Three Mile Island.

Is there more?  Absolutely.  Can I fill you in on more?  Probably not much more than this without a ton of research, and they don’t pay me enough for that.  In fact, if anyone else notes any inaccuracies in this article, please point them out in the comments.  I did my best to explain this correctly, but being that my background in this includes a little college-level physics, a nuclear engineer bff, and a general curiosity for the subject matter.  There are a number of good resources on both Japan’s nuclear plants as well as nuclear power on the internet from actual nuclear scientists that should be able to add more information, should you wish to seek it out.

World Nuclear News is an industry newsletter which has quite a bit of interesting information, as well as frequent news updates regarding the situation in Japan.  Interestingly enough, they’re also on facebook.

In addition, many news websites have good information in relation to the incident.  BBC News, Reuters, MSNBC, and Kyodo News have been rather informative.

Note:  I am working today until 4PM EST without access to a computer.  So if you comment and I don’t respond, it’s not because I don’t care, it’s because I can’t see it before 4.  Where’s that computer chip for my brain?

Where Are All the Nuclear Power Plants in the US?

Where are all these nuclear power plants that have been the cause of so much speculation?  Maybe in your back yard.  A full list is available at Wikipedia.

The first map is courtesy of Argonne National Laboratory.  It show the location of all plants active and inactive, well except the ones that government doesn’t want us to know about.  Closed plants are still not the kinds of places you want to build playgrounds and swimming pools.

Click image to enlarge

 

Next we have a nice map from world-nuclear.org.  This one shows only plants that are up and running.

Click image to enlarge

Many of the older reactors have been shut down as they become too expensive to maintain, obsolete or go past their permit date without an extension.  The cluster of dots on many locations are to show the multiple reactors per location.

From world-nuclear.org:

The USA has 104 nuclear power reactors in 31 states, operated by 30 different power companies. In 2008, the country generated 4,119 billion kWh net of electricity, 49% of it from coal-fired plants, 22% from gas and 6% from hydro. Nuclear achieved a capacity factor of 91.1%, generating 805 billion kWh and accounting for almost 20% of total electricity generated in 2008. Total capacity is 1088 GWe, less than one-tenth of which is nuclear.